Nikita Danilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Pollei writes: > > On 9/19/05, Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nikita Danilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It's other way around: declaration is guarded by the preprocessor > > > > conditional so that nobody accidentally use znode_is_loaded() > > > > outside of the debugging mode.
> > > Since when has a missing declaration prevented anyone calling a > > > function in C?! > It issues a warning, which is enough, given that reiser4 code was > warning-free most of the time. It is supposed to go into the kernel, which is not exactly warning-free. Besides, you don't know what idiotic new warnings the gcc people might dream up the next round, so just relying on no warnings is extremely unwise. As was said before: It it is /really/ wrong, arrange for it not to compile or not to link. If it isn't, well... then it wasn't that wrong anyway. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
