Pavel Machek wrote:
>Hi! > > > >>>>Second check... >>>>e2fsck 1.34 (25-Jul-2003) >>>> >>>> >>>I have 1.38 here, so yours is too old. >>> >>> >>I'll compile something new tomorrow and try to retest it. >> >> >> >>>OTOH if reiser4 survives that for 80 cycles... that's pretty good. >>> >>> >>Actually 125 before I've got completely tired of HDD noise. :) >> >> > >At tytso's request... could you put some reiser3 and reiser4 >filesystem images inside test data? > Pavel > > For V3 they will break things. For V4, sure, let's test it, I'd like to confirm that we fixed things.
