On November 10, 2005 04:36 am, Peter Foldiak wrote: > On Thursday 10 November 2005 12:26, PFC wrote: > > > book/chapter[3]/paragraph[2] > > > > I'd rather nitpick this to be : > > > > book/chapters/3/paragraphs/2 > > You are probably right, your version fits the Unix syntax and Hans' syntax > better. The first version was suggested only to be compatible with XPath > syntax (so that you could use XPath for the whole filesystem, not just > within a file [again, blurring the "file" boundary]). I don't know how > important that would turn out to be. PF
PF, I intend to work on a(n inefficient) proof-of-concept xPath shell once this attribute notation / storage mechanism is finished. -- Peter van Hardenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Victoria, BC, Canada
