-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hans Reiser wrote: > Jeff Mahoney wrote: > >> Hans Reiser wrote: >> >>> Jeffrey Mahoney wrote: >>>> Hans Reiser wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Sounds like acls or acl bugs. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Or not, since ACLs weren't enabled on the mount. >>> What happens if acls are used on one mount and not on another? >> >> To clarify, ACLs are a per-super feature. For this example, there >> weren't multiple mount points with different options, so per-super and >> per-mount are one and the same. >> >> If you mean if ACLs are enabled on one file system and not on another, > > no, I mean if mounted with acls enabled once and then without
Then the ACLs will no longer be interpreted, or inherited, until ACLs are enabled again. ACLs aren't read and the interpretive code is completely skipped if -oacl is not specified. If a file is deleted, all xattrs associated with the file, including ACLs, will be deleted. - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFERHH1LPWxlyuTD7IRAmTaAJ0Qbl7i7N+svQCIeYf94LyOl20HVgCfffIf 1yYoAuGzWZl6Wh1og6IFhJA= =MixN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
