-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111567/#review36707
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Andrea Diamantini


On July 18, 2013, 1:09 p.m., Diego Soenens wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111567/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 18, 2013, 1:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The current m_autoScrollTimer interval of 100ms (10 FPS!) makes 
> auto-scrolling feel sluggish and unresponsive.
> IMHO it should have the same interval as m_smoothScrollTimer (16ms) so that 
> it feels smooth and responsive.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/webtab/webview.cpp ce3f5a9 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111567/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Works perfectly on my system. CPU usage while auto-scrolling doesn't change 
> any more than it does while just scrolling with smooth scrolling enabled.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Diego Soenens
> 
>

_______________________________________________
rekonq mailing list
rekonq@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq

Reply via email to