> On July 29, 2013, 8:42 a.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote: > > Ship It!
Again, please let me know if you need help merging this. - Andrea ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111521/#review36713 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 15, 2013, 2:10 p.m., Paul Rohrbach wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111521/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 15, 2013, 2:10 p.m.) > > > Review request for rekonq. > > > Description > ------- > > Adding domain-specific hiding support to the adblocker. > > The domain-specific rules are stored in a QMultiHash, where the key is the > domain and the values are the rules for the specified domain. This causes > redundancy, because on rule can be applied to more than one domain, but has a > really fast look-up time. The code for the generic hiding has not changed and > is just relocated. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/CMakeLists.txt c749a69 > src/adblock/adblockelementhiding.h PRE-CREATION > src/adblock/adblockelementhiding.cpp PRE-CREATION > src/adblock/adblockmanager.h 3d329ad > src/adblock/adblockmanager.cpp 51000a3 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111521/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > - it hides things > - it is reasonably fast (generic hiding takes with my configuration > 300-500ms, the domain-specific hiding only takes 30-70µs) > > > Thanks, > > Paul Rohrbach > >
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list rekonq@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq