> On July 29, 2013, 8:42 a.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > Ship It!

Again, please let me know if you need help merging this.


- Andrea


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111521/#review36713
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 15, 2013, 2:10 p.m., Paul Rohrbach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111521/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 15, 2013, 2:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adding domain-specific hiding support to the adblocker.
> 
> The domain-specific rules are stored in a QMultiHash, where the key is the 
> domain and the values are the rules for the specified domain. This causes 
> redundancy, because on rule can be applied to more than one domain, but has a 
> really fast look-up time. The code for the generic hiding has not changed and 
> is just relocated.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt c749a69 
>   src/adblock/adblockelementhiding.h PRE-CREATION 
>   src/adblock/adblockelementhiding.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/adblock/adblockmanager.h 3d329ad 
>   src/adblock/adblockmanager.cpp 51000a3 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111521/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - it hides things
> - it is reasonably fast (generic hiding takes with my configuration 
> 300-500ms, the domain-specific hiding only takes 30-70µs)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul Rohrbach
> 
>

_______________________________________________
rekonq mailing list
rekonq@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq

Reply via email to