Hi, Maybe it would be better to change everything to kA? In the lib.dispersion code, I even call this parameter k_AB. In the manual, I have used kAB, where AB are subscripted. So for consistency, I think we should change everything everywhere! Maybe the best would be the k_AB parameter in the code? The reverse rate would then be called k_BA. This would be confused with the kex,B = k_BA + k_AB rate, or kB ~= kex,B, but if kB was used like kA is, then this would be a mess. What do you think?
Regards, Edward On 2 September 2013 15:16, Troels E. Linnet <[email protected]> wrote: > Follow-up Comment #15, sr #3071 (project relax): > > Renamed kA parameter to ka, to keep to already established parameter naming in > relax. > > Patch applied. > > (file #18829) > _______________________________________________________ > > Additional Item Attachment: > > File name: 0001-Renamed-kA-parameter-to-ka-to-use-the-same-parameter.patch > Size:9 KB > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://gna.org/support/?3071> > > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via/by Gna! > http://gna.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) > > This is the relax-devel mailing list > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password > reminder, or change your subscription options, > visit the list information page at > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
