Of course, that a good idea. The task is to complain harder with a RelaxError when R1 data is not loaded and one of the off-resonance R1rho models are selected (but not for M61 and other on-resonance models, as we need to support these and the special R1rho-R1 experiment type). But we should get your branch out of the way first. If you would like to optimise R1, as discussed in link in the first comment of this task (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.devel/5198), I would suggest that another task is created, and this feature is developed in a branch. The missing R1 RelaxError can be developed in trunk, as this is simple.
Regards, Edward On 17 June 2014 20:37, Troels E. Linnet <[email protected]> wrote: > Follow-up Comment #2, bug #21788 (project relax): > > Hi Ed. > > Can we add this feature? > > Ideally, I would like to implement fitting of R1. > This could be done, if no R1 data is loaded ? > > Best > Troels > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://gna.org/bugs/?21788> > > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via/by Gna! > http://gna.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) > > This is the relax-devel mailing list > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password > reminder, or change your subscription options, > visit the list information page at > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
