Note that I used the CR72 model as a base for many other slow exchange
models as it is a robust and quick solution which in most cases
accurately approximates the parameters of other models, especially the
numeric models.

Regards,

Edward


On 18 August 2014 16:38, Edward d'Auvergne <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The model IT99 is extremely different to all other models, hence it is
> not nested in the auto-analysis.  No other model approximates it
> parameters in any meaningful sense.  See
> test_suite/shared_data/dispersion/software_comparison for example.  I
> think that the model IT99 should have no corresponding nested model:
>
> MODEL_NESTING = {
>     ...
>     MODEL_IT99:  None
>     ...
> }
>
> To see this problem, just take any test data and optimise both CR72
> and IT99 and see if you can get any parameters to be close between the
> two models.  The new model nesting protocol is really starting to
> worry me.  Why did it change in the first place?
>
> Regards,
>
> Edward
>
>
>
>
> On 12 August 2014 10:54,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Author: tlinnet
>> Date: Tue Aug 12 10:54:49 2014
>> New Revision: 24988
>>
>> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=24988&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix for nesting kex, when model is CR72, and analysed models is IT99.
>>
>> sr #3135(https://gna.org/support/?3135): Optimisation of the R1 relaxation 
>> rate for the off-resonance R1rho relaxation dispersion models.
>>
>> Modified:
>>     branches/R1_fitting/specific_analyses/relax_disp/variables.py
>>     
>> branches/R1_fitting/test_suite/unit_tests/_specific_analyses/_relax_disp/test_variables.py
>>
>> Modified: branches/R1_fitting/specific_analyses/relax_disp/variables.py
>> URL: 
>> http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/R1_fitting/specific_analyses/relax_disp/variables.py?rev=24988&r1=24987&r2=24988&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- branches/R1_fitting/specific_analyses/relax_disp/variables.py       
>> (original)
>> +++ branches/R1_fitting/specific_analyses/relax_disp/variables.py       Tue 
>> Aug 12 10:54:49 2014
>> @@ -911,6 +911,10 @@
>>                  elif param == 'phi_ex' and compa_model.model in 
>> MODEL_LIST_ANALYTIC_CPMG + MODEL_LIST_NUMERIC_CPMG and model in 
>> MODEL_LIST_ANALYTIC_CPMG + MODEL_LIST_NUMERIC_CPMG:
>>                      continue
>>
>> +                # Special situation, where 'kex'=1/tex can still be nested 
>> from IT99 model.
>> +                elif param == 'tex' and compa_model.model in 
>> MODEL_LIST_ANALYTIC_CPMG + MODEL_LIST_NUMERIC_CPMG and model in 
>> MODEL_LIST_ANALYTIC_CPMG + MODEL_LIST_NUMERIC_CPMG:
>> +                    continue
>> +
>>                  # Else break out of the loop.
>>                  else:
>>                      # Break the for loop, if not found.
>> @@ -953,6 +957,13 @@
>>                  if compa_model.model in MODEL_LIST_R1RHO_W_R1_ONLY + 
>> MODEL_LIST_R1RHO_FIT_R1_ONLY:
>>                      return model_info, compa_model
>>
>> +        # Special case for IT99.
>> +        elif model in [MODEL_IT99]:
>> +            # Loop over the models.
>> +            for compa_model in compa_models:
>> +                # If one of the comparable models is in list with R1rho R1, 
>> return this.
>> +                if compa_model.model in MODEL_LIST_ANALYTIC_CPMG + 
>> MODEL_LIST_NUMERIC_CPMG:
>> +                    return model_info, compa_model
>>
>>      # If there is no comparable models according to EXP_TYPE, check if some 
>> models can be nested anyway.
>>      else:
>>
>> Modified: 
>> branches/R1_fitting/test_suite/unit_tests/_specific_analyses/_relax_disp/test_variables.py
>> URL: 
>> http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/R1_fitting/test_suite/unit_tests/_specific_analyses/_relax_disp/test_variables.py?rev=24988&r1=24987&r2=24988&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- 
>> branches/R1_fitting/test_suite/unit_tests/_specific_analyses/_relax_disp/test_variables.py
>>   (original)
>> +++ 
>> branches/R1_fitting/test_suite/unit_tests/_specific_analyses/_relax_disp/test_variables.py
>>   Tue Aug 12 10:54:49 2014
>> @@ -151,9 +151,27 @@
>>          model = MODEL_CR72
>>
>>          # Test the return.
>> -        print nesting_model(self_models=self_models, model=model)
>>          self.assertEqual(nesting_model(self_models=self_models, 
>> model=model)[1].model, MODEL_LM63)
>>
>> +        ## Test MODEL_IT99 model request, when models are CR72.
>> +        # Define all the models tested in the analysis.
>> +        self_models = [MODEL_R2EFF, MODEL_NOREX, MODEL_CR72, MODEL_IT99]
>> +
>> +        # Define which current model is selected
>> +        model = MODEL_IT99
>> +
>> +        # Test the return.
>> +        self.assertEqual(nesting_model(self_models=self_models, 
>> model=model)[1].model, MODEL_CR72)
>> +
>> +        ## Test MODEL_CR72 model request, when models are MODEL_IT99.
>> +        # Define all the models tested in the analysis.
>> +        self_models = [MODEL_R2EFF, MODEL_NOREX, MODEL_IT99, MODEL_CR72]
>> +
>> +        # Define which current model is selected
>> +        model = MODEL_CR72
>> +
>> +        # Test the return.
>> +        self.assertEqual(nesting_model(self_models=self_models, 
>> model=model)[1].model, MODEL_IT99)
>>
>>
>>      def test_nesting_model_cpmg_mmq(self):
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
>>
>> This is the relax-commits mailing list
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>> visit the list information page at
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-commits

_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-devel mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel

Reply via email to