Btw.

I don't have any particular need to show off my work. :-)

I am just glad, that relax really indeed now is in a state for being
the absolutely best program out now.

Nothing beats this.

Best
T

2014-09-03 21:31 GMT+02:00 Troels Emtekær Linnet <[email protected]>:
> Wholly mo!
>
> I will see if I find some time to look at all the changes.
>
> Thank for you big effort to go through this!
>
> Best
> Troels
>
> 2014-09-03 20:17 GMT+02:00 Edward d'Auvergne <[email protected]>:
>> Hi Troels,
>>
>> Could you also check http://wiki.nmr-relax.com/Relax_3.3.0#Description
>> and see if this covers all of your efforts?  I will wait to release
>> relax 3.3.0 until after you have checked the CHANGES file and the
>> release notes on the wiki and responded to these messages, as I don't
>> want to miss highlighting any of the huge number of your contributions
>> which make up this release.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Edward
>>
>>
>> On 3 September 2014 19:35, Edward d'Auvergne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Troels,
>>>
>>> I have now completed the CHANGES file for relax 3.3.0
>>> (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/tags/3.3.0/docs/CHANGES).  That was
>>> a huge effort and took up almost a whole day - the number of changes
>>> in this release is insane!   As this relax version includes your
>>> 'disp_spin_speed', 'r1rho_plotting' and 'R1_fitting' branches, as well
>>> as lots of trunk changes, most of this release is your code.  If you
>>> could study some of the changes I made and incorporate them into your
>>> future commit messages, it would save me a lot of time.
>>>
>>> Could you also have a look at this CHANGES file and check that the
>>> 'Features' and 'Bugfixes' sections are complete?  Don't worry about
>>> the ridiculous 'Changes' section, that is just far too long and is not
>>> important for relax users.  I have a feeling that you will like to
>>> expand the 'Features' section to show off more of your work.  And you
>>> will probably find a few important bugs not listed in the 'Bugfixes'
>>> section, as you often fix bugs without having a stand out commit
>>> message with text like "Fix for bug #...", "Bug fix...", etc. so I
>>> miss listing them in the 'Bugfixes' section.  Feel free to modify the
>>> file yourself:
>>>
>>> $ svn co svn+ssh://[email protected]/svn/relax/tags/3.3.0
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Edward
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2 September 2014 11:48, Edward d'Auvergne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Troels,
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if you had any plans for bug fixes, new additions,
>>>> etc. that you would like included in relax 3.3.0?  I'll probably try
>>>> to release this version soon.  I'm not sure yet if I'll merge in the
>>>> frame_order_testing branch which contains a huge number of changes for
>>>> the frame order analysis, or if I'll merge it later and release it as
>>>> relax 3.4.0.  Anyway, the release will happen soon (maybe this week)
>>>> as I will have time between calculations.  But it will take time due
>>>> to the huge number of changes, including the disp_spin_speed branch
>>>> merger.  I may ask you to help editing the commit messages, probably
>>>> via the wiki, for your changes in that dispersion branch.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Edward
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
>>
>> This is the relax-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>> visit the list information page at
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel

_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-devel mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel

Reply via email to