What about the gnome-autogen.sh script? Most of my autogen.sh files just run ". gnome-autogen.sh"
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Daniel Mustieles García <daniel.mustie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, thanks for clarifying! :) > > 2015-05-28 14:40 GMT+02:00 Philip Withnall <phi...@tecnocode.co.uk>: >> >> It’s already sort of tracked as part of the ModernAutotools goal, >> although that one lost momentum a while ago, so its status needs to be >> reset: >> >> https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/ModernAutotools >> >> However, since there’s no flag-day-changeover for gnome-common, I’m not >> sure it’s necessary to have a GNOME Goal. Maintainers hate touching >> build systems unnecessarily. >> >> Philip >> >> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:03 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: >> > Would this make sense to create a GNOME Goal[1] to ease/track the >> > change? >> > >> > [1] >> > >> > https://wiki.gnome.org/action/show/Initiatives/GnomeGoals?action=show&redirect=GnomeGoals >> > >> > >> > 2015-05-28 13:47 GMT+02:00 Philip Withnall <phi...@tecnocode.co.uk>: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > This cycle, Dave and I are planning for the last ever release >> > of >> > gnome-common. A lot of its macros for deprecated technologies >> > (scrollkeeper?!) have been removed, and the remainder of its >> > macros have >> > found better replacements in autoconf-archive[1], where they >> > can be used >> > by everyone, not just GNOME. >> > >> > We plan to make one last release, and people are welcome to >> > depend on it >> > for as long as they like. However, if you want new hotness, >> > port to the >> > autoconf-archive versions of the macros; but please do it in >> > your own >> > time. There will be no flag day port away from gnome-common. >> > >> > Note that, for example, porting to AX_COMPILER_FLAGS is >> > valuable, but >> > will probably require fixing a number of new compiler warnings >> > in your >> > code due to increased warning flags. We hope this will make >> > your code >> > better in the long run. >> > >> > There’s a migration guide here: >> > >> > https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeCommon/Migration >> > >> > We’ve tried to make the transition as easy and smooth as >> > possible, but >> > there will inevitably be hiccups. Please let me know about >> > anything >> > which breaks or doesn’t make sense. First person to complain >> > about >> > -Wswitch-enum gets a prize. >> > >> > >> > For developers >> > --- >> > >> > When building from a tarball of a module which uses the new >> > macros, you >> > will no longer need gnome-common installed. (Although you may >> > not have >> > needed it before.) >> > >> > When building from git, you will need m4-common[2] or >> > autoconf-archive[1] installed. >> > >> > JHBuild bootstrap installs m4-common automatically, as does >> > gnome-continuous; so you don’t need to worry about that. >> > >> > For packagers >> > --- >> > >> > In the 3.14.0 release, gnome-common installed some early >> > versions of the >> > autoconf-archive macros which conflicted with what >> > autoconf-archive >> > itself installs. It now has a --[with| >> > without]-autoconf-archive >> > configure option to control this. We suggest that all >> > packagers pass >> > --with-autoconf-archive if (and only if) autoconf-archive is >> > packaged on >> > the distribution. See bug #747920[3]. >> > >> > m4-common *must not* be packaged. See its README[2]. m4-common >> > is >> > essentially a caching subset of autoconf-archive. >> > >> > For continuous integrators >> > --- >> > >> > Modules which use the new AX_COMPILER_FLAGS macro gain a new >> > standard >> > --disable-Werror configure flag, which should be used in CI >> > systems (and >> > any other system where spurious compiler warnings should _not_ >> > cause >> > total failure of a build) to disable -Werror. The idea here is >> > that >> > -Werror is enabled by default when building from git, and >> > disabled by >> > default when building from release tarballs and in buildbots. >> > >> > Philip >> > >> > [1]: http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/ >> > [2]: https://github.com/desrt/m4-common/ >> > [3]: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747920 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > desktop-devel-list mailing list >> > desktop-devel-l...@gnome.org >> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list >> > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-l...@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list -- Jasper _______________________________________________ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.