On Monday 12 March 2007 00:36, Tom Albers wrote: > > - Calling the release "4.0.0" with the two zeros looks strange. Wouldn't > > it be more common to call it "4.0"? > This is a real problem I think. On several mailinglists I see that people > are expecting 4.0.0 to be better than 3.5.6. I'm a bit scared that > expectations are too high. Adding an extra 0 might help here? Let's call it 3.9.0 then ;) _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
- [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 Release Roadmap Allen Winter
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 Release Roadmap Cornelius Schumacher
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 Release Roadmap Tom Albers
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 Release Roadmap Alexander Dymo
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 Release Roadmap Cornelius Schumacher
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 Release Roadmap Cyrille Berger
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 Release Roadm... Christian Ehrlicher
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 Release ... Johann Ollivier Lapeyre
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 Rele... Aaron J. Seigo
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 ... Christian Ehrlicher
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 ... Johann Ollivier Lapeyre
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 ... Cyrille Berger
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 ... Benjamin Reed
- Re: [V2.0] KDE4.0.0 Release ... Cornelius Schumacher
