On Friday 16 March 2007 12:04:40 pm Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > On Friday 16 March 2007 16:37, Allen Winter wrote: > > > > Would there be any major objections to shifting the entire plan forward > > by 1 month? > > > > Reasons: > > 1) The subsystem freeze on 1 April is only 2 weeks from now and we > > still haven't finalized the roadmap. > > Which subsystems do you expect to be added to kdelibs which won't make it for > April 1, but will be able to make it a month later? > > > 2) I was chatting with some of the core devs this morning, and there is > > still *lots* to-do in kdelibs. (eg, no gui in core, no qt3support in > > kdeui+kio; all BC-related, so it can't be done later) > > These all sound not like they would be affected by the subsystem freeze and > to > the kdelibs soft API freeze there still is quite some time. > > > 3) more time to arrange a kdelibs dev meeting > > As this should be a small meeting to be efficient, I don't think we need too > much time in advance. In fact for example piggying back on the meeting Simon > mentioned might be easier than to arrange something new a month later. > > > So, 1 May would be the subsystem freeze, with 1 month added onto > > all the other milestones. > > Wouldn't it be better to try to go with the aggressive schedule and move > things later in case we really aren't able to make it? >
Ok. I won't change the plan. Also annma reminded me that a 1 month shift might not fit well with aKademy. Forget I mentioned it. -Allen _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
