Le jeudi 10 janvier 2008, Riccardo Iaconelli a écrit : > On Jan 10, 2008 7:50 PM, Allen Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 13:42:50 Urs Wolfer wrote: > > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:29:39 Stephan Binner wrote: > > > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 15:37:33 Allen Winter wrote: > > > > > The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be > > > > available > > > > > > > in our base system. > > > > > > > > More critical than kmix? :-) Wanting to say, kmix belongs there too > > > > imo. > > > > > Yes, I agree. Both kwalletmanager and kmix belong to kdebase. > > > I think kdebase/runtime would be the correct place for these. > > > > I suggested kdebase/apps instead of kdebase/runtime because > > moving anything into runtime causes a co-installability issue > > that I'm sure one of the packagers will yell about. > > > > But either one of those locations is better than kdeutils IMO. > > Agreed, and personally I'm for kwallet in runtime/, it is a runtime > dependency to me, > while kmix can probably fit well into apps/.
KMix is a muldimedia application, and so belongs to kdemultimedia. > > I almost think that ark, kcalc, kgpg, kfloppy, and sweeper > > could go into kdebase as well. > > Agreed for ark (it's a shame that we don't have an unzipper in a basic > installation), I disagree... KDE is the set of all applications in every modules. And a basic installation would include all main modules. I would say it is a shame to don't have a mail client in a basic installation. for me, ark can stay to kdeutils. > but not for the other ones, they belong to kdeutils IMHO (that's why the > module exist). IMO, we should not try to move things to kdebase, but maybe even the other way around. Just my 2 cents. -- Olivier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team