On Tuesday 22 July 2008 14:13:17 Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Saturday 19 July 2008, Matthias Kretz wrote: > > That's not entirely right. For the last beta I asked dirk to do the > > automoc4 0.9.83 tarball. You can find it on ftp.kde.org. > > unstable/support/automoc4
I suggest to have a toplevel directory for automoc4 and phonon and not put it in support. > > I need an automoc4 0.9.84 release as soon as possible, though. (I already > > released one package on kde-apps.org that needs 0.9.84 when using cmake > > 2.6) > > which svn revision should we use for the new release? note that I don't > like the %_libdir dependency (it doesn't make sense to install a .cmake > file which is platform independent under /lib/ anyway). I'm staying out of the libdir discussion... aside from that I'm fine with tagging current svn as 0.9.84 and using it for the KDE 4.1/Phonon 4.2 release. It's not ready for 1.0 yet IMO, but it should get there soon. > > I think the automoc (and phonon for that matter) releases need a better > > place on ftp.kde.org. And either someone will need to take responsibility > > for those releases or I need to get access and instructions how to do > > them. > > I can put new tarballs there and give people access as needed, whatever is > preferred. I hwoever need the information which svn revision to tag or when > something got tagged, that I should create the tarball. > > While we talk about it, will there be a new phonon release for 4.1.0? :) I just tagged phonon. You can find it in tags/phonon/4.2.0 now. -- ________________________________________________________ Matthias Kretz (Germany) <>< http://Vir.homelinux.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team