On Monday 08 September 2008, Tom Albers wrote: > In rescheduling the 4.2 release, it seems we missed the fact that by moving > the schedule forward, we can no longer depend on Qt 4.5. I wonder if that > is the right thing to do. What would be the disadvantage to revert this > change (besides me looking silly), and having a 5 month 4.3 cycle?
3 months of devel and 2 months of freeze? i suppose it could work for one release. rather tight, but better than altering 4.2 at this point as that is going to screw over at least a couple major KDE projects that do actual planning ahead of time (PIM and Plasma) and likely others. the KDE imaging people are planning a sprint in november as well.. i believe that time was chosen in part due to the previous schedule. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
