Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Over at Kubuntu we're trying to concince our technical board that its > ok to put KDE minor point releases in updates. However it seems > there's no formal rules for what is or isn't acceptable in minor point > releases. I think it would be a good thing to have some since it > gives guidance on what should or shouldn't be put into release > branches after release. So I wrote some down quickly. Does this make > sense to adopt for KDE? Additions welcome. > > http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy/Draft
I assume the "only for bugs with high user impact." was perhaps left a bit vague on purpose, but that feels a bit overly restrictive to me. For example, that would seem to exclude common sense items and/or simple/obvious fixes. -- Rex _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
