On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:53:50 -0500 Michael Pyne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday, December 13, 2010 16:49:29 Tom Albers wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > Dirk, > > > We were discussing in #kde-sysadmin whether it made sense to move not > > > just trunk/4.7 development to Git next week, but 4.6 as well. No one > > > really likes the idea of having two SCMs active at the same time, > > > which was the current plan. > > > > > I object to the transition next week of the 4.6.x code. I propose to do the > > transition after the 4.6.0 has been released. > > I highly agree that we should wait until after the 4.6 release to shift over. > Most devs *should* have at least setup git by now (but in reality there are > many still on svn-only for sure), and the rest of Tom's reasons are > completely > valid IMO. [Not directed to anyone in particular] Why didn't these objections surface before when we asked and not now when we tell what will happen, or was they just forgotten/ignored? /Regards Torgny _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
