El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 22:39:24, Myriam Schweingruber va escriure: > Hi Albert, > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote: > > El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 13:07:35, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > >> Hey, > >> > >> On Sunday, May 20, 2012 13:19:36 Allen Winter wrote: > >> > I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for > >> > KDE > >> > 4.9. > > > >... > > > > I've had a look at old Dirk scripts and i think i can get 4.8.80 out quite > > easily, anyone against me trying to get the tagging done this thursday? > > Wow, that would be fantastic! > May I just ask why 4.8.80 and not 4.8.90?
Because .80 is the number we've used for all the first unstable releases according to http://websvn.kde.org/tags/KDE/ Albert > I am a bit puzzled by the > inconsistency of the numbering of beta and RC releases in the last 4 > KDE SC releases, please see also my question about this a few days > back. It would really help me and all other triagers to know which is > the definite scheme in use. > > Regards, Myriam _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team