El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 22:39:24, Myriam Schweingruber va 
escriure:
> Hi Albert,
> 
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote:
> > El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 13:07:35, Sebastian Kügler va 
escriure:
> >> Hey,
> >> 
> >> On Sunday, May 20, 2012 13:19:36 Allen Winter wrote:
> >> > I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for
> >> > KDE
> >> > 4.9.
> >
> >...
> >
> > I've had a look at old Dirk scripts and i think i can get 4.8.80 out quite
> > easily, anyone against me trying to get the tagging done this thursday?
> 
> Wow, that would be fantastic!
> May I just ask why 4.8.80 and not 4.8.90? 

Because .80 is the number we've used for all the first unstable releases 
according to http://websvn.kde.org/tags/KDE/

Albert

> I am a bit puzzled by the
> inconsistency of the numbering of beta and RC releases in the last 4
> KDE SC releases, please see also my question about this a few days
> back. It would really help me and all other triagers to know which is
> the definite scheme in use.
> 
> Regards, Myriam
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Reply via email to