El Dimecres, 21 de novembre de 2012, a les 11:38:09, Allen Winter va escriure: > Sounds like we need a new module for graphics libraries. > Along the lines of kdepimlibs, but for graphics
Why? The people developing those libraries don't want to maintain the ABI/API of these libs during all the life of 4.x And I think this is a fair request, if they respect soname bumps, and regular versioning stuff why should we force them to do so? Cheers, Albert > > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:54:20 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > > Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > it seems like there are api-incompatible changes in libkdcraw-4.9.80 > > > (compared to 4.9.x). > > > > ... > > > > > No problem inside KDE proper, and I also know that digikam-3_betaX and > > > kipi- plugins-3_betaX is fixed. However... Are there any other known > > > third-party consumers for that? > > > > kphotoalbum uses libkdcraw > > > > On a similar note, libkipi also had changes that breaks > > kamoso, https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307147 > > and > > kphotoalbum, https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307148 > > > > -- rex > > > > _______________________________________________ > > release-team mailing list > > release-team@kde.org > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > release-team@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team