On Wednesday 13 February 2013 01:00:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimarts, 12 de febrer de 2013, a les 22:05:00, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > > On Tuesday 12 February 2013 15:28:35 Anke Boersma wrote: > > > This whole thread was about stable tars, not RC or Beta. > > > > Sorry at least to me that was not obvious. (thread started on 31. of > > January, doesn't mention minor releases, so I assumed it meant the > > upcoming > > release of 4.10) - all I wrote so far was explicitly for the case of a > > 4.x.0 release. > > > > > What was found > > > and reported often, is regressions from say, 4.x.2 to 4.x.3. > > > Reported not in bug reports, but more a discussion on IRC, see if anyone > > > was aware, sometimes ml, again, just checking if it was a known/accepted > > > regression. > > > > status quo is that currently the branches are basically untested. > > That is *your* thinking, i.e. you don't test them, but i think it is a bit > off a stretch to present that as the reality. Although i agree more users > of the stable branch would help. do you know any developer running branch instead of master? I don't -- Martin Gräßlin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team