On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote:
> El Divendres, 31 d'octubre de 2014, a les 14:49:47, Aleix Pol va escriure: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> > wrote: > > > El Dijous, 30 d'octubre de 2014, a les 13:32:26, David Narvaez va > escriure: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > While going through my checklist for 14.12 readiness, I totally > forgot > > > > the obvious: merge the frameworks branch into master. I remembered > > > > that now that the freeze is in place, so I am wondering if I can get > a > > > > last minute chance to merge my frameworks branch if the 14.12 > branches > > > > have not yet been created. > > > > > > Question, is the frameworks branch a pure port of the master branch to > KF5 > > > or > > > it has new features? > > > > > > If it has new features that we want users to be able to use, i'd say go > > > ahead > > > and merge it, if it's "the same thing" but just ported to KF5, i'm > > > undecided > > > (would welcome others opinions). > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Albert > > > > > > > Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. > > > > > > > > David E. Narvaez > > > > I'd say it depends on the maintainer, but in general it's more work to > > maintain 3 branches (qt4 and frameworks, and KDE/14.12). > > How's that an issue? Speaking theoricatelly since he already merged > frameworks > to master yesterday, if we did not allow it because it was past the freeze > he > could have done it after the freeze and still only have 2 branches to > maintain > Applications/14.12 and master, no? > > Cheers, > Albert > > > > > Aleix > > Yes, but it's still 2 different code-bases and merges need to be taken with a pinch of salt. Aleix
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team