Hi Sebastian, Please find my comments below.
2015-07-02 12:54 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Kügler <se...@kde.org>: > If for example I want to use fish:// for my desktop folderview, I'd have to > install something from applications. That's what I meant. Nitpicking: there are application outside of KDE Application that let you access fish://, for example Krusader. But still, there is nothing wrong in installing only kio-extras from KDE Applications and nothing else from it. >> I am not opposed to having it in frameworks if that's the consensus, but I >> find it arguable. It brings features to users (like apps), not to >> application developers (like frameworks). > > Surely it does, as soon as an app developer wants to integrate a specific > protocol for their app (and not just "any" protocol, like KIO), then this > would be needed. I imagine getting something from a webdav server, or storing > a file on a specific backup service.) If an app developer wants to integrate WebDAV with the help of KIO, then kio-extras will be a run-time dependency, so there's absolutely no reason for having kio-extras in Frameworks. -- Alexander Potashev _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team