El dissabte, 20 de gener de 2024, a les 17:39:15 (CET), Fabian Vogt va escriure: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, 8. Dezember 2023, 12:56:09 CET schrieb Jonathan Riddell: > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 10:53, Antonio Rojas <aro...@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > > - phonon: Qt5/6 versions collide (translations) > > > > > > > > For Phonon and similar cases the translations are shared, why not just > > > > > > package the translations with one of them which you know to be > > > installed? > > Is this actually valid?
I ran lrelease from Qt5 and Qt6 over the same phonon libphonon_qt.po and they generated exactly bit by bit the same file. Is that not your experience? > I don't expect that Qt 5 will always be able to read > QM files produced for Qt 6. The other way around is probably not guaranteed > either. Whether there's a promise or not that this will forever be the same, can't say. Cheers, Albert > > IMO the translations need to contain the Qt version in their path name, > either filename or somewhere in the installation path. > > This is also an issue for e.g. kimageannotator: > https://invent.kde.org/graphics/gwenview/-/merge_requests/245#note_851730 > > Cheers, > Fabian > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > Because none of them is guaranteed to be installed. Only the one that is > > > pulled as a dependency of something will > > > > Can you put them in a common package that both libraries depend on? > > > > Having two translations for the same repo with the same strings would > > likely cause more effort for translators. > > > > Jonathan