Ziller Eike: > I don't care if there are Qt Creator sources in the installer or not, > I don't see a big reason to include it (though it also might be > interesting for people to have a look at the sources, e.g. to see > what is necessary for supporting Qt4+Qt5), and I don't see a big > problem with including them. > > *If* we include any headers/sources, it should just be the whole > source package (just pulling out headers wouldn't make much > sense as explained), and IMO it should be an extra component > in the installer.
I fully agree. The main use case is to have a show case "Hey, look, there's a non-trivial application running on both Qt 4 and Qt 5, sources are right in front of you!" - and whether that's worth 17MB download for everybody I don't know. For actual development of Qt Creator plugins, open or not, using sources from git is much more convenient. About the only case I could think of that would be different is some environment without direct internet access. Andre' _______________________________________________ Releasing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
