On Thursday, November 08, 2012 17:45:30 Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Friday, November 02, 2012 15:37:50 Motyka Rafal wrote: > > Please receive the next update on the smoke test of installer packages. > > > > Recommendation: Not ready for further testing. > > I notice people are submitting testing reports. Has the recommendation > changed? Are the packages ready for further testing?
Ah, sorry I just noticed the other mail. > > If they are, and if the packages at origin really are candidates to release > as 'beta 2', then why are there still open bugs that the blocker depends > on? > > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-27319 > > Either the open bugs need to be marked as fixed (if they are fixed) or > closed as invalid or can't reproduce, or removed from the meta bug. > > If they are not fixed and are going to be removed from the meta bug, I'd > like to know why, as was it was decided before that that is what we'll do. I'd still like to know about this. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions ** Qt Developer Conference: http://qtconference.kdab.com/ **
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Releasing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
