On terça-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2013 09.18.39, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Hi there, > > A commit to Qt 4.8 was lost as it missed the branching of Qt 5. > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,46060 > > The Qt 4 commit is here: > > https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/commit/0f6853e9c775dd8fbb64f66119c2c9b2ea23da > 29 > > Very important note: The remark that the commit should be removed in Qt 5 > was added by Gabriel, not by me. I don't know why he added that remark. It > was not what I submitted: http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/merge_requests/694 > > Thiago suggested adding that commit to Qt 5.0.1, but I'll let him add the > reason for that.
It's a bad idea to have a method in 4.8 and 5.1, but not in 5.0. Stuff present in 4.8 and absent in 5.0 are usually the deprecated things, which is not the case. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Releasing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
