Hi,

The more there are changes, the more we need to test and the higher the 
probability of some other things going wrong. If there is only one (or few 
enough) change to an existing version, we can release binaries in a couple of 
days e.g. to address a vulnerability or like this case a bad bug.

Yours,

                             Tuukka

From: Releasing [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Giuseppe D'Angelo
Sent: keskiviikkona 22. kesäkuuta 2016 11.04
To: Jani Heikkinen <[email protected]>
Cc: Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Releasing] [Development] brown paper bag issue in Qt 5.6.1 
packages


On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Jani Heikkinen 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
In my opinion bumping version numbers and doing totally new release because of 
just one fix is too heavy. I think we should have a way to produce this kind of 
update with 'simple hot fix ' easily and quickly without re-doing whole release 
in case of this kind of blocker.

This reopens a question which is still very obscure to the community (or at 
least to me), which is: what is the complexity of creating packages? Why is 
redoing packages with a different version number (say, by branching 5.6.1 into 
5.6.2) "too heavy"? Could you please share some insights on what happens behind 
the scenes?

Thank you,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
_______________________________________________
Releasing mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing

Reply via email to