Re: Locke and Rosenberger

[Steven Jamar]

I think part of the reason for the cursory treatment of Rosenberger is 
that Rosenberger really is not as broad or likely to be expanded or 
extended beyond its particular facts as advocates of the majority 
decision would like it to be.

There is a difference between the religion clauses and speech clauses 
and Rick's hypo demonstrates this well.

Steve


--
Prof. Steven D. Jamar                                 vox:  202-806-8017
Howard University School of Law                       fax:  202-806-8428
2900 Van Ness Street NW                     mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Washington, DC  20008      http://www.law.howard.edu/faculty/pages/jamar
"The only things truly worth doing cannot be accomplished in a single 
lifetime."

Prof. Goler Teal Butcher, after Reinhold Neibuhr

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw