The majority reports that the District "properly" conceded that the flyers
contained "no evangelical or overtly religious language." Why is this
relevant? If the court's theory is an absence of coercion, than should not
even "evangelical or overtly religious" literature be permitted? {The Ninth
Circuit in the Scottsdale case similarly held that overtly religious flyers
could be excluded form a distribution program.)
Marc Stern


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 6:29 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Child Evangelism Fellowship v. Montgomery County

        I'm puzzled by Judge Michael's "coercion" argument:  "The
Establishment Clause forbids a state from coercing 'anyone to
support or participate in religion or its exercise.'  If the Montgomery
County Public Schools (the School System) give Child Evangelism
Fellowship of Maryland, Inc. (CEF) access to the School System's
take-home flyer forum, elementary students will be required to
distribute CEF's religious flyers to their parents. The students, in
other words, will be coerced to participate in a religious activity in
violation of the Establishment Clause."

        The students wouldn't be asked to say anything religious, or
endorse religion -- they'd be asked to deliver a piece of paper,
something no different than a postman would do when told to deliver
religious materials.  If the postman can be required to deliver
religious materials alongside everyone else without this being
unconstitutional coercion -- presumably because he's being required to
engage in a secular task, the delivery of mail, even though the mail
happens to be religious -- then why would the child be any different?
(See the majority, note 8.)

        Nor does it matter, I think, that these are impressionable
elementary school students.  Why would even a 9-year-old, when told to
bring a flyer to his parents, wrongly but reasonably feel this to be a
religious exercise?

        Eugene
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw



_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Reply via email to