I still don't get Marty's discrimination argument. These pamphleteers are not excluding anyone (they'd probably be happy to give the pamphlet to anyone who wanted it). They're just choosing an audience. What if a group of evangelical Christian teens at a public school decided to pick five Jewish students that each knew best, invite the Jewish acquaintance(s) to a conversation in the hall, and then say something like "I like you and you're my friend, so I'd hate to see you burn in hell for failure to accept Jesus. Will you please come to church with me on Sunday so you can learn more about this?" Unless this sort of proselytizing takes the form of persistent and unwanted attention, amounting to interference with the freedom of movement or educational pursuits of others, I do not understand the basis for suppressing it. Arguments for gay and lesbian rights may be just as threatening to deep structures of identity as arguments to convert to evangelical Christianity; may the school ban gay rights pamphlets, targeted at members of churches that preach against homosexuality? Vegans, by the way, can be quite aggressive in their proselytizing efforts -- or have you never seen or heard a vegan-led protest about fur coats or eating the flesh of animals raised under inhumane conditions? There is indeed an attempt at "moral intimidation" in these protests, and it should be stalwartly defended. The remedy in these situations, as Brandeis said, is counterspeech, not enforced silence.
Chip Lupu Ira C. ("Chip") Lupu F. Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law The George Washington University Law School 2000 H St., NW Washington D.C 20052 (202) 994-7053 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.