Eugene has a point. The tailoring requirement suggests considering alternatives short of expulsion, even aside from the accommodation issue. Also, within the educational context, the school's decision should (in a perfect world) be remedial, not punitive.

 --
Steven K. Green, J.D., Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Director, Center for Law and Government
Willamette University College of Law
245 Winter St., SE
Salem, OR 97301
503-370-6732


Volokh, Eugene wrote:

I'm puzzled by how this argument would be reconciled with traditional strict scrutiny analysis, which is what the Indiana Constitution seems to call for. Is it really the case that expelling students for missing 8 days of school is *necessary* to accomplish the compelling state interest in providing an adequate education to students? The case for accommodation here seems much stronger than, say, in Wisconsin v. Yoder (though I realize that there are distinctions between the two cases).
Or is the argument that strict scrutiny should not apply in K-12 education?
Eugene


    -----Original Message-----
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
    Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 3:53 PM
    To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
    Subject: Re: Student reprimanded for religious absences

Surely education is a compelling state interest and requiring
attendance as a part of that and setting an attendance policy is
within the discretion of the school board. This is a decision not
for the courts.
At some point there needs to be some accommodation. But it cannot be
an accommodation that requires missing a full week of school each year.
Should the school district amend its rules and provide greater
accommodation for students of various religious backgrounds? Surely.
Should courts step in and make it a matter of constitutional right?
I would tread that ground very, very cautiously.



------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.


_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.

Reply via email to