Jim- I absolutely agree that knowing the facts of the matter affects the analysis. I'm quite curious to know the specifics of what he passed out and what was opposed and why. I'm going only on the media reports at this point. But I wondered if there were any thoughts from those on the list about the legal questions involved. Somehow it ended up with the thread having to do with facial jewelry. Ed Brayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.