Come on.  Are these tits and tats really what this list is for?  A little restraint goes a long way.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Newsom Michael
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 4:53 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Steven Williams Case - more factual information .:.

No, that isn't the rub.  There is nothing like the EC that speaks to either biology or oxygen.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Steven Williams Case - more factual information

 

In a message dated 12/15/2004 3:47:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Rather than saddling teachers with a burden, perhaps the better course of action is not to try to "teach" religion in the public schools at all.

Of course, one might try to teach biology without discussing oxygen.  Can it be done?  Sure.  Should it be done?  That, my friend, is the rub.

 

Jim Henderson

Senior Counsel

ACLJ

Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP mail server made the following annotations on 12/15/2004, 04:06:50 PM
---------------------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to