Consider two possibilities.
 
First, a group of liberal and conservative legal elites acts together, either informally or formally, to support high quality justices.  Liberals endorse the McConnells of the world, conservatives the Kathleen Sullivans of the universe.
 
Second,  members of one political ideology act with quote "integrity" and support qualified members of rival ideologies, but there is no reciprocity.
 
Might it be argued that acting with integrity in the second case is selfish and makes the political system worse off, by skewing the membership of the courts.
 
Mark A. Graber

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to