Is anyone else slightly amused by the Justices' references, with regard to the Supreme Court frieze,  to Chief Justice Marshall as a "law giver"? Cf. U.S. Const. Art. I, sec. 1.

 

Mark S. Scarberry

Pepperdine University School of Law

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Marty Lederman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 2:24 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Van Orden Transcript

 

And here's the McCreary County transcript:

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 4:55 PM

Subject: Van Orden Transcript

 

 http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/03/transcripts_in_1.html

Transcript(s) in Ten Commandments Cases

03:45 PM | Marty Lederman | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

The Associated Press has posted an earlier-than usual transcript of Wednesday's oral argument in the Texas Ten Commandments case. We're still checking to see whether the transcript in the Kentucky case, McCreary County, is also available.


_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.
  • RE: Van Orden Transcript Scarberry, Mark

Reply via email to