>From some perspectives, the only meaningful difference among Judaism, Christianity, and Islam is when they stopped accepting new prophets-- Christianity with Jesus, Islam with Mohammed, Judaism (not stopped yet). All look to Moses, all claim a belief in one god, all started in the same part of the world, all are based on many of the same principles and teachings of the same people, and so on. To a polythiest or nature worshiper or a person from outside of the three western religions they may seem to be the same in the respects most important to that outsider.

But one would not really say that for nearly any demographic purpose the adherents to the three traditions are adhering to the same religion.

So we need to establish our frame of reference with some care, I think, when we speak of what is or what is not a religion, especially for religious freedom and establishment purposes. And when we talk about demographic matters, it depends on what we want to focus on. It is meaningful to say that Christianity is the dominant religion in the United States for some purposes, but not for others.

Steve

--
Prof. Steven D. Jamar vox: 202-806-8017
Howard University School of Law fax: 202-806-8567
2900 Van Ness Street NW mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Washington, DC 20008 http://www.law.howard.edu/faculty/pages/jamar/

"Example is always more efficacious than precept."

Samuel Johnson, 1759

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to