http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/religdisc/sa_supp.wpd
> Do you have an electronic copy of the Salvation Army brief filed by the > government? > Marc Stern > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Treene > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:59 PM > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Subject: RE: Locke v. Davey follow-up > > Here is the case Marc was referring to. The City appealed, and then > settled > the case: > > 221 F.Supp.2d 390 > > United States District Court, > E.D. New York. > > Joan DAILY, Plaintiff, > v. > NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Anthony Richburg, Reinaldo Pagan, and > Louis > Ortiz, Defendants. > > No. C.A. CV-02-1293(DGT). > > Sept. 11, 2002. > > > Public housing resident sought preliminary injunction restraining > enforcement of city housing authority's policy pursuant to which she was > denied her application to use community center at public housing > development > to conduct Bible study/grief counseling sessions to comfort residents > following the events of September 11, 2001. The District Court, Trager, > J., > held that: (1) community center at public housing development was a > nonpublic forum at times and a limited public forum at other times; (2) > decision to deny resident's request constituted viewpoint > discrimination; > and (3) decision to deny resident's request was not reasonable in the > light > of purpose of the restriction. > > > Eric W. Treene > (in my personal capacity) > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marc Stern > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 1:41 PM > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Subject: RE: Locke v. Davey follow-up > > > I do not have time to find the decision, but there is a New York City > Housing Authority cases involving a no religious use of community rooms, > which a district court struck as unconstitutional. > Marc > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Klemetti > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 9:34 AM > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Subject: Re: Locke v. Davey follow-up > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I wouldn't be so sure. Because I used to help moderate the ACLU > > message boards (http://forums.aclu.org), I've seen a lot of strange > > complaints posted including one very similar to the Volokh hypo and > > Brownstein corollary. I particularly recall a reverend in Oklahoma > > posting about a married couple in his church who receive both federal > > Section 8 housing assistance and a state disability check. The state > > of Oklahoma apparently prohibits the husband from using his disability > > > check to tithe to the church. The couple's apartment manager also says > > > they can't hold Bible study meetings in Section 8 housing. See the > > December 11, 2004 post in the thread at this link/address: > > > http://forums6.aclu.org/messageview.cfm?catid=81&threadid=7115&STARTPAGE > =3 > > > <http://forums6.aclu.org/messageview.cfm?catid=81&threadid=7115&STARTPAG > E=3> > > The prohibition of using disability checks to make charitable > contributions or tithes is unenforceable. > They could not control the putting of cash into donation boxes. > > And the prohibition of using housing or apartments for Bible Study is > unconstitution, that is > prohibiting the freedom of worship and assembly. > > > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly > or wrongly) forward the messages to others. > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly > or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly > or wrongly) forward the messages to others. > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. > Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people > can > read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the > messages to others. _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
