|
In a message dated 7/28/2005 7:43:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure why it is implied that one's oath to God is false or rather to a false God unless one's hand is on the Bible. How can a pluralist society take a stand on which God is the true God? For constitutional and legal purposes, do you distinguish between
pluralistic and tolerant societies? Are there features of particular
significance in the Constitution that indicate to you that we are one, or the
other, or both? Is this a distinction without a difference?
Jim Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ
|
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
