There are some interesting cases out there--at least several in the last five years--on requirements that the probationer attend AA and similar meetings that involve recognition of a higher power. I can't point you to a particular article offhand.
Eric Treene (in my personal capacity) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Samuel V Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 2:46 PM To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Probation requirements Can anyone point me to an article, preferably available online, discussing whether probation requirements violate free exercise? For example, is a free exercise problem created whensuch as when the effect of the restriction is to prohibit the probationer to attend the church of his choice (because he can't leave town, can't be near children, can't be near wine, etc.). If you'd like to respond offlist, please do so to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others. _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
