Gene Summerlin wrote:
Again, you are attacking a caricature of evolution. No one - I repeat, no one - thinks that "genetic mutations can take an organism from being a fish to being a giraffe". Mutation is only the primary source of variation (not the only source because, as you point out, there is also natural variation that occurs through recombination, which is the hallmark of diploid species and likely the reason that sexual reproduction is the dominant form of reproduction in the natural world). Natural selection is the primary means of preserving useful variations, but not the only means (there are also genetic drift, species selection and others). But no one in the world, ever, under any circumstances, has taken the position that you object to. So when you say that my position is "impossible to defend", you aren't talking about my position, you are talking about a simplistic parody that not only do I not take, but no one anywhere takes. This is the very definition of beating up a straw man. Evolution says that speciation is the result of not only mutations, but natural selection combined with other non-adaptive mechanisms and reproductive isolation over time. You're not attacking evolution, you're attacking a crude and simplistic cartoon version of evolution that has nothing to do with the real world. Ed Brayton |
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.13/78 - Release Date: 8/19/05
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.