Professor Duncan writes: "UC officials have decided to "single out one perspective, and turn down these courses because of their Christian perspective," said Wendell Bird, an Atlanta-based lawyer who filed the lawsuit in Los Angeles federal court. "That is flat-out discrimination." "
I am not sure this is that helpful. 1. I suspect most people would agree that if the UC system is behaving as counsel describes, they are behaving unconstitutionally. I suspect, by the way, that even Professor Duncan might agree that if the facts as presented in the UC brief are 100% correct, then they ought to win. 2. I suspect most people would agree that in a very high percentage of constitutional lawsuits, particularly at the district court level, if the facts as alleged by one party ar correct, then that party ought to win on the merits. Mark A. Graber _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
