|
There are even more to choose from: - ACLU v Schundler (rejecting EC challenge to holiday display under endorsement test) - ACLU v Wall Twp (rejecting EC challenge to holiday display for lack of standing) - Blackhawk v PA (upholding FEC challenge by Native American bear owner against PA policy forbidding keeping animals in captivity) - CH v Oliva (dissent in 6-6 split of 3d Cir en banc involving viewpoint discrimination challenge to prohibition on 1st grader’s choice to read Beginner’s Bible story (containing no reference to God) in response to classroom assignment to pick favorite story).
-----Original Message-----
As most of you probably already know, Judge Alito has written several very interesting opinions on the religion clauses, including, most notably, FOP v. Newark (1999), perhaps the strongest post-Lukumi reading of the Free Exercise Clause in the courts of appeals, and Christian Evangelism Fellowship (2004), involving whether a religious organization was constitutionally entitled to hand out literature to elementary school students (and whether the school district would violate the Establishment Clause by permitting such activity). |
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
