I don't think this case has been mentioned, but this all came down yesterday. In the Matthew Limon case in Kansas, the guy who was convicted of underage sex with another male and given a 17 year sentence when the sentence if his partner was female would have been 15 months, struck down unanimously by the Kansas Supreme Court recently, there is a new development with church and state implications. The judge has released him into the custody of his aunt and uncle, but ordered that he must attend church every week. This seems to me to be an obvious violation of the free exercise clause. Any thoughts?
Ed Brayton
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
