That's too
high a level of abstraction at which to cast the question -- too much turns on
the sort of "burden" that you're discussing. Certainly the majority (and
the minority) bears the burden of, for instance, not discriminating based on
religion in the government's actions with respect to individuals or
institutions. On the other hand both the majority and the minority bear
the very different burden of having to deal with speech that offends
them.
When the
question relates to speech that conveys that offend some people, the First
Amendment generally imposes on listeners the burden of having to deal with the
offense, rather than letting the government impose on speakers the burden of
having their speech restricted.
Eugene
|
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.