Re: Kansas and Intelligent Design: A Twist

[Steven Jamar]

I think Doug has stated this well.  But perhaps it understates the challenge presented by evolution -- if science can explain so much, then what is left?  It also understates the challenge to the Biblical literalists -- if evolution is correct, then the Biblical story is wrong.  If the Biblical story is wrong in any detail, it is all suspect.  If it is suspect, then what?  This is the line I've heard not only from young-earther creationists, but also from those who accept the geological and astronomical data and information and see in the Biblical creation stories another sort of truth or perhaps allegorical truth.  To them, evolution challenges even that remaining confidence. I understand the all or nothing viewpoint -- though I reject it.  Just read Prof. Rick Duncan's recent sig for this attitude. Steve On Nov 23, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Douglas Laycock wrote: I agree with Ed Brayton's posts on the limits of science.  My take on the line between science and religion in the Intelligent Design debate is this:  the defined task of science is to produce the best naturalistic explanation possible.  That explanation is random variation and natural selection (fully elaborated, with multiple mechanisms of selection).  That explanation is sufficient to explain the origin of species, and that explanation does not assume purpose or guidance or design.  That is as much as science can say. [snip] This clarification, even when understood, comforts some believers but not all.  Just as some believers want the support of the state for their faith, some also want the support of science.  Even a model that says evolution could have happened without divine guidance is too threatening.  --  Prof. Steven D. Jamar                               vox:  202-806-8017 Howard University School of Law                     fax:  202-806-8567 2900 Van Ness Street NW                   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Washington, DC  20008   http://www.law.howard.edu/faculty/pages/jamar/ "If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from him.  An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest." Benjamin Franklin

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.