[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks to me like that press release is essentially an admission that the NCBCPS curriculum is unconstitutional under current precedent. The author first says that the Supreme Court has ruled that the bible can be taught in public schools as long as it's taught from a scholarly perspective and the school can't endorse the content, then he complains that the Bible Literacy Project curriculum encourages critical thinking about the bible and it "does not teach the Bible as the inerrant word of God", problems he says are not present in the NCBCPS curriculum. Isn't that pretty much an admission that the NCBCPS curriculum violates the Supreme Court's standards for teaching about the bible in public schools? Ed Brayton |
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
