In a message dated 12/13/2005 1:20:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet surely the answer is that it's perfectly legitimate for Eugene, of course you are correct, so far as you take your point.
There is no government orthodoxy, as I understand it, that may be imposed on the
thinking of the People about matters of politics, religion, and the like (a
separate fight, please, about the meaning of "imposed"). But what about
when the question moves beyond support for or opposition to the death penalty to
actual cases? What happens when people of faith enter the jury box?
What then are the constitutional strictures? If Venireman
Smith may base his support for, or opposition to, the death penalty,
on the teaching of his faith, how may the government modify its treatment
of him in respect of that religious fount for his opinions and actions?
If, in honest answer during voir dire, he expresses the view that the
death penalty is illicit in all cases, based on that religious belief, must he
be excused for cause? may he be excused for cause?
If Venireman Smith supports the death penalty for murder because of
the teaching of his faith, must he be excluded from service while Venirewoman
Jones be retained for service because her opinions on the death penalty are not
traceable to religious teaching or faith?
May the Prosecutor (as I suspect is more likely) or the defense counsel
inquire into religious faith with the intent and purpose of rooting out
veniremen whose religious identity would likely predispose them in one way or
another on the question of death?
Jim Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ
|
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.