At 07:32 AM 3/11/2006, you wrote:
In a message dated 3/10/2006 11:16:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This was the right move for the Archdiocese to make. Really, it was the only move they could make. It's sad that many children will suffer, but the Archdiocese has to obey its conscience.

     Isn't this precisely symmetrical to religions opposed to interracial adoption? Or is the point that opposition to interracial adoption is irrational while opposition to adoption by gays is not? 
 
Bobby
 
Robert Justin Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of Law
Delaware

in my opinion it *is* precisely symmetrical because interracial marriages were considered immoral. The arguments against gay marriage are entirely recycled from another era.

Susan


---------------
Author of
Murder on the Waterfront http://tinyurl.com/87m54
Jubilee, A Novel http://tinyurl.com/9x6m9
The Pocket Darwin http://www.nuuf.org/darwin1.html
And Much More: http://www.coganbooks.net

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to