The widespread NIMBY attitude towards religious activities in land use law raises a substantial cumulative barrier to religious activity, especially for new and small religious organizations.
 
Douglas Laycock
University of Texas Law School
727 E. Dean Keeton St.
Austin, TX  78705
512-232-1341
512-471-6988 (fax)


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 3/12/2006 1:59 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: Catholic Charities Issue

Wow-- land use planners turn religious activity into illegal activity?  Hardly.  It's always interesting how the adherents of RLUIPA forget that we're talking about location, not content.  Land use planners occasionally reject a location for a religious activity, but the activity itself is never forbidden by mere land use planners.  To be sure, religious entities want the most convenient and inexpensive location they can have (regardless of impact on the community or the neighbors), but that religious desire for the ideal location for religious mission does not transform the land use planner's actions into actions that go to content.
 
Marci 
 
 
 
In a message dated 3/12/2006 10:18:52 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rick asks:
 
"Who else has a political agenda that targets the ordinary activities (such as adoption ministries and health benefits) of mainstream religious institutions and turns these ministries into unlawful acts."
 
 
Answer:  Land use planners.
 
 
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to